By using a photo diode with given predetermined sensitivity and wavelength
response, one can obtain an absolute accuracy of better than perhaps 10%
(I verified this with an accurate thermistor detector). From data sheets
one infers that typical diodes have a sensitivity of say 0.5mA/mW at 900nm,
and less than that at shorter wavelengths; usually they have a sensitive
area of only 1-3 square-millimeters, which yields a quite low output.
After some experimentation, I converged to the PIN-10AP from UDT, which I had
obtained conveniently from here; its
data sheet is here. This diode
has the dual advantage that is has a) a large surface area of 1cm^2, which
helps to even out small scale intensity fluctuations and also allows to accurately
aim a (weak) beam onto the sensitive area; b) a calibrated spectral
response curve that allows to match various wavelengths with good accuracy
(2%).
Concretely, with R2=1K this gives for power measurements up to ca 3 mW (where
the whole beam must hit the sensitive area):
488nm: .055 mA/mW ---> amplifier
output U = 55 mV/mW
514nm: .162 mA/mW ---> amplifier output
U = 162 mV/mW
532nm: .238 mA/mW ---> amplifier output
U = 238 mV/mW
630nm: .073 mA/mW ---> amplifier output
U = 73 mV/mW
On the other hand, with these data one can directly compute the exposure time
for a given holographic film and wavelength (for this, set R2=100K for hundred-fold
sensitivity), see my web interface.
Note added: I measured the sensitivity of the PIN-10AP sensor by comparison with a Thorlabs S20MM power meter, and found that the above values are matched remarkably well, ie, to within 3-5% (I checked only for 514nm and 532nm). Pretty good for an uncalibrated photo sensor !